Comparison of thoracic pedicle screw to hook instrumentation for the treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Journal: Spine
Published:
Abstract

Methods: Retrospective, case-control, matched cohort. Objective: Compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of adult spinal deformity patients treated with thoracic pedicle screw (TPS) or thoracic hook constructs.

Background: The efficacy of TPS instrumentation for pediatric spinal deformity correction has been established. Little is known about TPS use in adult spinal deformity.

Methods: Fifty-six patients (average age, 49 years; average follow-up, 3.58 years) were treated with TPS or thoracic hook constructs for coronal (n = 20) or sagittal (n = 36) plane deformities. Patients were evaluated radiographically and with SRS scores.

Results: Coronal deformities treated with TPS demonstrated improved main thoracic curve correction compared with hook constructs at last follow-up (24.8 degrees vs. 13.8 degrees; P < 0.05), despite having larger (59.8 degrees vs. 44.9 degrees; P < 0.05) and more rigid preoperative curves (29.3% vs. 44.9% correction on side-bending radiographs; P < 0.001). Sagittal deformities treated with TPS constructs demonstrated greater thoracolumbar kyphosis correction than hook constructs at last follow-up (12.1 degrees vs. 2.5 degrees; P < 0.05). No TPS patient had a thoracic pseudarthrosis. Four hook patients (14%) had thoracic pseudarthroses.

Conclusions: TPS instrumentation allows greater coronal and sagittal plane correction and may reduce the risk of thoracic pseudarthrosis compared with hook constructs when treating adult spinal deformities.

Authors
R Bess, Lawrence Lenke, Keith Bridwell, Gene Cheh, Stephen Mandel, Brenda Sides
Relevant Conditions

Kyphosis, Spinal Fusion