Early versus late amniotomy for labour induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Journal: The Journal Of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine : The Official Journal Of The European Association Of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation Of Asia And Oceania Perinatal Societies, The International Society Of Perinatal Obstetricians
Published:
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of early vs. late amniotomy on delivery mode in women undergoing induction of labor.

Methods: 143 women admitted for induction were randomized to early amniotomy (EA, concomitant with the beginning of oxytocin infusion; n = 71) or to late amniotomy (LA, four hours after the beginning of oxytocin; n = 72). Randomization was stratified by parity. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean. Secondary outcomes were duration of labor and intrapartum fever.

Results: The cesarean rate was similar between groups (18% vs. 17% among nulliparous; and 3% vs. 0% among parous women, in EA and LA group, respectively). However, EA was associated with shorter oxytocin-to-delivery interval (12 vs. 15 h) and a non-significant decrease in intrapartum fever (3% vs. 25%) than LA in nulliparous women (p = 0.05).

Conclusions: For women undergoing oxytocin induction, early amniotomy is associated with shorter labor in nulliparous women with no effect on the risk of cesarean section in both nulliparous and multiparous women.

Authors
Karine Gagnon Gervais, Emmanuel Bujold, Marie-hélène Iglesias, Louise Duperron, André Masse, Marie-hélène Mayrand, Andrée Sansregret, William Fraser, François Audibert