The impact of screening tools on diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently misdiagnosed or undiagnosed, which can delay disease management interventions.
Objective: The Screening, Evaluating and Assessing Rate CHanges of diagnosing respiratory conditions in primary care 1 (SEARCH1) study assessed whether screening using the COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS) questionnaire to detect COPD risk factors and symptoms, with or without a handheld spirometer (copd-6) to detect airflow limitation, can increase yields of COPD diagnosis and respiratory-related clinician actions in primary care.
Methods: A prospective, multi-center, pragmatic, comparative-effectiveness, cluster-randomized study conducted from September 2010 to October 2011 (data analyzed from December 2011 to January 2013). Methods: Men and women aged ≥40 years visiting their participating primary care practice for any reason. Methods: Practices were randomized to three study arms: COPD-PS + copd-6, COPD-PS alone, and usual care (no interventions). No practices received any specific education about COPD or its diagnosis. Methods: The primary endpoint was yield of new clinical COPD diagnosis; the secondary endpoint was yield of respiratory-related clinician actions.
Results: Of 9,704 patients enrolled, 8,770 had no prior COPD diagnosis and were included in endpoint analyses. Both interventions significantly increased COPD diagnostic yield over 8 weeks. Compared with a mean yield of 0.49% (0.13%) (controls), yields were 1.07% (0.20%) (OR=2.20, 95% CI=1.26, 3.84, p=0.006) and 1.16% (0.22%) (OR=2.38, 95% CI=1.38, 4.13, p=0.002) for COPD-PS and COPD-PS+copd-6 study arms, respectively. Respiratory-related clinician actions were not significantly different across study arms.
Conclusions: Office-based assessment can significantly increase COPD diagnosis by primary care physicians. Future trials must evaluate whether screening can improve outcomes for patients with COPD.