Validation of the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-BM22 in patients with bone metastases.

Journal: Supportive Care In Cancer : Official Journal Of The Multinational Association Of Supportive Care In Cancer
Published:
Abstract

Objective: Our aim is to test the validity, reliability, and acceptability of the Chinese version of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bone Metastases 22 (EORTC QLQ-BM22) module to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with bone metastases in China.

Methods: Patients with histological confirmation of malignancy and bone metastases from Tianjin Cancer Institution and Hospital from June 2013 to April 2014 were enrolled in this study. All patients self-administered the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and the EORTC QLQ-C30. The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was performed to evaluate scores. The reliability and validity tests of the questionnaires were based on Cronbach's α coefficients, Pearson correlation test, and Wilcoxon rank sum nonparametric test.

Results: Internal consistency reliabilities of all the four scales were acceptable. Scales measuring similar HRQOL aspects were found to correlate with one another between EORTC QLQ-BM22 and EORTC QLQ-C30, but differences still existed. Significant differences were demonstrated in the scores of all four subscales of the QLQ-BM22 between the two KPS subgroups (KPS ≤ 80; KPS > 80). Meanwhile, the compliance for item completion of the QLQ-BM22 was satisfactory.

Conclusions: The Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-BM22 is a reliable and valid instrument, which is appropriate for measuring the HRQOL of patients with bone metastases in China.

Authors
Lei Zhang, Yan-jun Su, Jia-yue Chen, Zhi-chao Liao, Zhi-qin Luo, Shu-min Xie, Jing Zhang, Yun-shou Lin, Hui Guo, Wei-lin Sun, Begüm Pekbay, Adam Miller, Le Luo, Yu-hua Rui, Mo-han Li, Chang-li Wang
Relevant Conditions

Bone Tumor