Management implications of resection margin histology in patients undergoing resection for IPMN: A meta-analysis.

Background: IPMN is a relatively new clinical entity and surgeons are continuing to develop their understanding of this complex pathology. Little is known of the natural disease process post-resection of an IPMN, particularly the impact of gland histology and margin status on the chance of recurrence and survival in benign and invasive IPMN.

Methods: An online search was conducted to evaluate and include those studies which reported on gland histology, margin status and disease recurrence in resected benign and malignant IPMN. A Meta analysis was then performed using a random effects model.

Results: The chance of recurrence in non-invasive margin positive IPMN is similar to margin negative IPMN. The chance of recurrence is higher in invasive gland IPMN compared to non-invasive gland. The vast majority of recurrences occurred in patients with positive margins demonstrating invasion.

Conclusions: All patients with intra- or post-operative evidence of invasive carcinoma at the resection margin should undergo further resection to achieve a negative margin. Patients with evidence of IPMN at the transaction margin (even with changes of high grade dysplasia/CIS) may not achieve any benefit from further resection. Patients with recurrence in benign/non-invasive IPMN should undergo re-resection, whereas patients with recurrence in invasive IPMN should not.