Two Doses of Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept versus Bevacizumab in Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Three-Armed, Double-Blind Randomized Trial.

Journal: Ophthalmology. Retina
Published:
Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of 2 doses of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in the treatment of center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME) at 12 weeks.

Methods: Three-armed, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Methods: Eyes with center-involved DME. Methods: In this trial, 123 eyes with DME were randomly assigned to 3 injections of 1.25 mg IVZ, 2.5 mg IVZ, and 1.25 mg IVB every 4 weeks. Complete ophthalmologic examination and central macular thickness (CMT) measurement by optical coherence tomography were performed every 4 weeks up to 12 weeks. Methods: Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 weeks.

Results: Although no significant difference was evident between the 2 ziv-aflibercept groups at 12 weeks, the BCVA change was significantly better in the ziv-aflibercept 1.25 mg group than in the IVB group at the 12-week visit (P = 0.021). In regard to CMT changes, there was no significant difference between the 2 ziv-aflibercept groups; however, a significantly greater reduction in CMT was observed in the ziv-aflibercept 2.5 mg group compared with the IVB group at 12 weeks (P = 0.037). Subgroup analysis disclosed no difference in BCVA outcomes at 12 weeks among the groups in the eyes with baseline BCVA ≥20/50. In the eyes with baseline BCVA <20/50, the improvement was significantly better at 12 weeks in the ziv-aflibercept 1.25 mg group compared with the IVB group (P = 0.011).

Conclusions: The 12-week results of this trial disclosed that both 1.25 mg and 2.5 mg doses of IVZ and IVB demonstrated BCVA improvement over baseline in the treatment of center-involved DME. However, a stronger effect of IVZ compared with IVB in terms of both visual acuity improvement and macular thickness reduction was detected in the eyes with initial BCVA <20/50. Longer-term efficacy and safety data will be needed to understand the role for this drug in practice.

Authors
Ahmadreza Baghi, Mohammad Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Alireza Ramezani, Mohsen Azarmina, Siamak Moradian, Mohammad Dehghan, Ramin Nourinia, Gholam Peyman, Mehdi Yaseri, Masoud Soheilian