Vision-related quality of life after pars plana vitrectomy with or without combined cataract surgery for idiopathic macular hole patients.

Objective: To evaluate the influence of vision-related quality of life (VR-QOL) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without combined cataract surgery for idiopathic macular hole (IMH) patients.

Methods: This prospective consecutive case series study included 53 eyes of 53 consecutive IMH patients who were divided into two groups: 34 eyes underwent PPV combined with cataract surgery (combined group), 19 eyes only underwent PPV (vitrectomy group). Clinical data were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months after surgery, respectively, including VR-QOL evaluated by The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25), logarithm of minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA) using ETDRS chart, severity of metamorphopsia evaluated by M-Charts, contrast sensitivity evaluated by functional acuity contrast test, MH diameter detected by SD-OCT and lens opacity assessment evaluated by Lens Opacity Classification System III (LOCS III). ANOVA and LSD, Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the difference in logMAR BCVA, metamorphopsia scores, contrast sensitivity, LOCS III scores and VFQ-25 scores between three time points; Spearman's rank correlation test was used to test the correlations between logMAR BCVA, metamorphopsia scores, contrast sensitivity, LOCS III scores and VFQ-25 scores.

Results: All eyes had achieved an anatomical success after surgery in both groups. BCVA (logMAR), metamorphopsia and contrast sensitivity were significantly improved at month 3 and month 6 (p = < 0.005). VFQ-25 composite and four subscale scores (general vision, near activities, distant activities, role difficulties) were significantly improved in combined group at month 6 compared with baseline (p = 0.011, 0.001, 0.003, < 0.001, 0.009). VFQ-25 composite and two subscale scores (general vision, role difficulties) were significantly and negatively correlated with logMAR BCVA (p = 0.046, 0.011, 0.012) and metamorphopsia (p = 0.009, 0.002, < 0.001) in combined group. VFQ-25 composite and four subscale scores (general vision, near activities, distance activities, mental health) were significantly improved in vitrectomy group at month 3 compared with baseline (p = 0.014, 0.047, 0.011, 0.018, 0.037). VFQ-25 composite score and mental health score were significantly decreased in vitrectomy group at month 6 compared with month 3 (p = 0.031, 0.029) and were significantly and negatively correlated with LOCS III score (p = 0.047, 0.017) at month 6.

Conclusions: Visual function and VR-QOL were significantly improved after successful macular hole surgery. The fluctuation of VR-QOL after surgery was attributed to the progression of the lens opacity. PPV combined with cataract surgery can help macular hole patients to maintain stable VR-QOL improvement by degrees.