Impact of Surgical Technique on Surgical Margin Status Following Partial Cystectomy.

Journal: Urologic Oncology
Published:
Abstract

Introduction: We assessed the impact of open or minimally-invasive partial cystectomy on surgical margin status in a nationwide hospital-based cohort. Materials and

Methods: Patients who underwent partial cystectomy from 2010 to 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. The primary outcome was surgical margin status. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify patient, hospital, and surgical factors associated with positive surgical margins (PSMs).

Results: Partial cystectomy was performed in 1,118 patients via open (n = 715, 64%), laparoscopic (n = 209, 19%), and robotic (n = 194, 17%) approaches. Overall, 220 (19.7%) patients had PSMs. The PSM rate by surgical approach was 19.6% for open, 18.2% for laparoscopic, and 21.6% for robotic (P = 0.678). Compared to open partial cystectomy, the laparoscopic (aOR 1.06, 95%CI 0.70-1.60, P = 0.782), and robotic (aOR 1.28, 95%CI 0.85-1.91, P = 0.235) approaches were not significantly different in terms of PSM rate. There were higher odds of PSMs in non-Hispanic blacks (aOR 1.93, 95%CI 1.09-3.39, P = 0.023) compared to non-Hispanic whites, and in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (aOR 3.28, 95%CI 2.00-5.37, P < 0.001) or tumor size ≥ 3 cm (aOR 1.67, 95%CI 1.21-2.30, P = 0.002). Tumors in a dome/urachal location had lower odds of a PSM compared to tumors in a nondome/urachal location (aOR 0.67, 95%CI 0.47-0.94, P = 0.022).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that partial cystectomy using a laparoscopic or robotic-assisted approach is not associated with an increased risk of PSMs compared to open partial cystectomy.

Authors
Michael Owyong, Tulay Koru Sengul, Feng Miao, Shirin Razdan, Kevin Moore, Mahmoud Alameddine, Sanoj Punnen, Dipen Parekh, Chad Ritch, Mark Gonzalgo