Why Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Get Stuck during Implementation and What Can Be Done: A Case Study in Pediatric Rehabilitation.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to obtain the perspectives of occupational and physical therapists working in pediatric rehabilitation about the factors that influence implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) using the case of constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT). We aimed to identify factors that hinder implementation of CPGs and strategies for overcoming barriers when widespread implementation is stalled.

Methods: Qualitative case study methodology was bounded within the parameters of CIMT implementation in pediatric rehabilitation in one jurisdiction. Twenty-one occupational and physical therapists participated in one of three focus groups. Data were analyzed using an inductive qualitative approach.

Results: Participants viewed CPGs as useful, and emphasized the importance of consistency between guidelines and relevance to practice context. Therapists considered the "art and science" in clinical decision-making. Barriers and facilitators to CPG implementation were identified at the client, clinician, intervention location and systemic level. Potential solutions to help "unstick" guideline implementation were consistent with theories of collective knowledge exchange and mindlines.

Conclusion: The presence of CPGs does not ensure evidence uptake; understanding of local barriers is required. This case study highlights the value of a collective knowledge exchange approach and attention to the social structures of knowledge development and evidence use.