Deamidated gliadin peptide and tissue transglutaminase antibodies in children with coeliac disease: A correlation study.

Objective: Serological tests for coeliac disease (CD) are important in the clinical diagnosis and monitoring of response to a gluten free diet (GFD). The tests differ in their sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy. In this study, tissue transglutaminase (IgA) (tTG-IgA) antibody was compared with the deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP), of both IgG (DGP-IgG) and IgA (DGP-IgA) types, in patients with CD.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of 2 years, between 2016 and 2018, at King Abdulaziz University Hospital in children 18 years of age or younger with biopsy-proven CD. Patients' sera were tested for DGP-IgA, DGP-IgG, and tTG-IgA antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A Pearson correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa coefficient were performed to analyse the serological tests.

Results: The study included 26 patients with CD, with a median age of 15 years (range, 5-18 years). Seventeen patients (65.4%) were males. The median disease duration was 5 years (range, 3-14 years). Fifteen patients (57.7%) reported good adherence to a GFD. The patients' serological tests showed a mean ± SD tTG-IgA titer of 149.8 ± 75 u/ml, a mean DGP-IgG titer of 62.5 ± 36.5, and a mean DGP-IgA of 32 ± 23.3 μ/ml. We found a significant correlation between tTG-IgA and DGP-IgG (r = 0.69, P < 0.001), tTG-IgA and DGP-IgA (r = 0.67, P < 0.001), and DGP-IgG and DGP-IgA (r = 0.83, P < 0.001). Cohen's kappa coefficient (k) showed substantial agreement between tTG-IgA and DGP-IgG (k = 0.71, P < 0.001) and DGP-IgG and DGP-IgA (k = 0.69, P < 0.001), but moderate agreement between tTG-IgA and DGP-IgA (k = 0.45, P = 0.006).

Conclusions: We found a good correlation between tTG-IgA and DGP-IgG and tTG-IgA and DGP-IgA, and substantial agreement between tTG-IgA and DGP-IgG, but moderate agreement between tTG-IgA and DGP-IgA. These results indicate that DGP-IgG was comparable to tTG-IgA and may be useful as an alternative to tTG-IgA in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with CD.