AP-002: A novel inhibitor of osteoclast differentiation and function without disruption of osteogenesis.

Journal: European Journal Of Pharmacology
Published:
Abstract

AP-002 is a novel, gallium-based, anti-cancer oral compound in clinical development for cancer patients with bone metastases. We examined the effects of AP-002 on osteoclastogenesis, fusion, and osteogenesis. AP-002 exhibited a dramatic effect on osteoclast function without causing osteoclast cell death. The expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase and cathepsin K mRNA levels was down-regulated in RAW264.7 cells treated with AP-002 in the presence of soluble receptor activator of NF-κB ligand. AP-002 was also found to block the fusion of osteoclasts from RAW264.7 cells. AP-002 had a similar inhibitory effect on RANKL-induced mouse primary bone marrow monocytes fusion. Human blood monocytes treated with AP-002 failed to form TRAcP/ACP5-positive cells. AP-002 caused these inhibitory effects without causing osteoclast cell death, which was in contrast to zoledronic acid controls. Furthermore, unlike zoledronic acid, AP-002 did not inhibit Rac1 activation. Gene expression analysis by microarrays showed that AP-002 significantly reverses the effects of RANKL-induced gene expression. These include several key osteoclast-differentiation/function-associated genes such as: Scinderin, OCSTAMP, Atp6v0d2, OSCAR, RhoU, Usp18, MMP9, and Trim30. The difference between AP-002 and zoledronic acid is also seen in its effects on osteogenesis. Osteoblast mineralization was promoted by AP-002 (0.1-3.0 μM), whereas zoledronic acid showed toxicity to osteoblasts at the concentration >0.5 μM, in the same dose range where it causes osteoclast cell death. Zoledronic acid therefore has no therapeutic window in its toxic effect on osteoclasts and osteoblasts. AP-002 promotes osteogenesis in this therapeutic window, while blocking osteoclast development. We therefore conclude that AP-002 has potential as a new anti-bone resorption agent, with a mechanism of action different compared with other currently marketed anti-bone resorption agents.

Authors
Yongqiang Wang, Yixue Mei, Yushan Song, Carly Bachus, Chunxiang Sun, Hooshmand Sheshbaradaran, Michael Glogauer