Comparison between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance for body composition measurements in adults with chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional, longitudinal, multi-treatment analysis.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for assessment of body composition in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Methods: We performed cross-sectional and prospective analyses by DXA and BIS in whole body (BISWB) and segmental (BISSEG) protocols in CKD non-dialysis-dependent (n = 81), hemodialysis (n = 83), peritoneal dialysis (n = 24), and renal transplantation (n = 80) patients. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were evaluated. Linear regression analysis was performed for bias assessment and development of equations. Receiver operating characteristics curve was constructed for diagnosis of inadequate error tolerance (DXA - BIS >±2kg).
Results: The agreement with DXA was greater for BISWB than BISSEG; for fat mass (FM; ICC men = 0.894; women = 0.931) than fat-free mass (FFM; ICC men = 0.566; women = 0.525), with greater bias for FFM as muscle increases and for FM in body fat extremes. The agreement was lower for body change analysis (ICC FFM men = 0.196; women = 0.495; ICC FM men = 0.465; women = 0.582). The ratio of extra- to intracellular water (ECW/ICW), body mass index, fat mass index, waist circumference, resistance, and reactance interfered in bias between methods. An ECW/ICW cutoff point of ≥0.7250 for inadequate error tolerance was determined. New prediction equations for FFM (r2 = 0.913) and FM (r2 = 0.887) presented adequate error tolerance in 55% and 63% compared with 30% and 39% of the original equation, respectively.
Conclusion: For body composition evaluation in patients with CKD, BIS applied using the whole body protocol, in normal hydration patients with CKD is as reliable as DXA; BIS must be used with caution in overhydration patients with ECW/ICW ≥ 0.7250. The newly developed equations are indicated for greater precision.