Abbreviated MRI for Secondary Surveillance of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Presumed Curative Treatment.

Background: Little is known about the performance of abbreviated MRI (AMRI) for secondary surveillance of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative treatment. Purpose: To evaluate the detection performance of AMRI for secondary surveillance of HCC after curative treatment. Study type: Retrospective. Population: A total of 243 patients (183 men and 60 women; median age, 65 years) who underwent secondary surveillance for HCC using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI after more than 2 year of disease-free period following curative treatment, including surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Field strength/sequence: A 3.0 T/noncontrast AMRI (NC-AMRI) (T2-weighted fast spin-echo, T1-weighted gradient echo, and diffusion-weighted images), hepatobiliary phase AMRI (HBP-AMRI) (T2-weighted fast spin-echo, diffusion-weighted, and HBP images), and full-sequence MRI ASSESSMENT: Four board-certified radiologists independently reviewed NC-AMRI, HBP-AMRI, and full-sequence MRI sets of each patient for detecting recurrent HCC. Statistical tests: Per-lesion sensitivity, per-patient sensitivity and specificity for HCC detection at each set were compared using generalized estimating equation.

Results: A total of 42 recurred HCCs were confirmed in the 39 patients. The per-lesion and per-patient sensitivities did not show significant differences among the three image sets for either reviewer (P ≥ 0.358): per-lesion sensitivity: 59.5%-83.3%, 59.5%-85.7%, and 59.5%-83.3%, and per-patient sensitivity: 53.9%-83.3%, 56.4%-85.7%, and 53.9%-83.3% for NC-AMRI, HBP-AMRI, and full-sequence MRI, respectively. Per-lesion pooled sensitivities of NC-AMRI, HBP-AMRI, and full-sequence MRI were 72.6%, 73.2%, and 73.2%, with difference of -0.6% (95% confidence interval: -6.7, 5.5) between NC-AMRI and full-sequence MRI and 0.0% (-6.1, 6.1) between HBP-AMRI and full-sequence MRI. Per-patient specificity was not significantly different among the three image sets for both reviewers (95.6%-97.1%, 95.6%-97.1%, and 97.6%-98.5% for NC-AMRI and HBP-AMRI, respectively; P ≥ 0.117). Data

Conclusion: NC-AMRI and HBP-AMRI showed no significant difference in detection performance to that of full-sequence gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI during secondary surveillance for HCC after more than 2-year disease free interval following curative treatment. Based on its good detection performance, short scan time, and lack of contrast agent-associated risks, NC-AMRI is a promising option for the secondary surveillance of HCC. Evidence level: 3. Technical efficacy: Stage 2.