Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.

Journal: Lancet (London, England)
Published:
Abstract

On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization marked the removal of the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, introducing a complex ethical and legal landscape for patients and providers. This shift has had immediate health and equity repercussions, but it is also crucial to examine the broader impacts on states, health-care systems, and society as a whole. Restrictions on abortion access extend beyond immediate reproductive care concerns, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the ruling's consequences across micro and macro levels. To mitigate potential harm, it is imperative to establish a research agenda that informs policy making and ensures effective long-term monitoring and reporting, addressing both immediate and future impacts.

Authors
Claire Brindis, Melissa Laitner, Ellen Clayton, Susan Scrimshaw, Barbara Grosz, Lisa Simpson, Sara Rosenbaum, Corale Brierley, Melissa Simon, Yvette Roubideaux, Bruce Calonge, Paula Johnson, Laura Destefano, Ashley Bear, Kavita Arora, Victor Dzau