Automated Imaging Differentiation for Parkinsonism.

Journal: JAMA Neurology
Published:
Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) paired with appropriate disease-specific machine learning holds promise for the clinical differentiation of Parkinson disease (PD), multiple system atrophy (MSA) parkinsonian variant, and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). A prospective study is needed to test whether the approach meets primary end points to be considered in a diagnostic workup. To assess the discriminative performance of Automated Imaging Differentiation for Parkinsonism (AIDP) using 3-T diffusion MRI and support vector machine (SVM) learning. This was a prospective, multicenter cohort study conducted from July 2021 to January 2024 across 21 Parkinson Study Group sites (US/Canada). Included were patients with PD, MSA, and PSP with established criteria and unanimous agreement in the clinical diagnosis among 3 independent, blinded neurologists who specialize in movement disorders. Patients were assigned to a training set or an independent testing set. MRI. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) in the testing set for primary model end points of PD vs atypical parkinsonism, MSA vs PSP, PD vs MSA, and PD vs PSP. AIDP was also paired with antemortem MRI to test against postmortem neuropathology in a subset of autopsy cases. A total of 316 patients were screened and 249 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.8 [7.7] years; 155 male [62.2%]) met inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 99 had PD, 53 had MSA, and 97 had PSP. A retrospective cohort of 396 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [8.9] years; 234 male [59.1%]) was also included. Of these patients, 211 had PD, 98 had MSA, and 87 had PSP. Patients were assigned to the training set (78%; 104 prospective, 396 retrospective) or independent testing set, which included 145 (22%; 60 PD, 27 MSA, 58 PSP) prospective patients (mean age, 67.4 [SD 7.7] years; 95 male [65.5%]). The model was robust in differentiating PD vs atypical parkinsonism (AUROC, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; positive predictive value [PPV], 0.91; negative predictive value [NPV], 0.83), MSA vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.98; NPV, 0.81), PD vs MSA (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.97; NPV, 0.97), and PD vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.92; NPV, 0.98). AIDP predictions were confirmed neuropathologically in 46 of 49 brains (93.9%). This prospective multicenter cohort study of AIDP met its primary end points. Results suggest using AIDP in the diagnostic workup for common parkinsonian syndromes.

Authors
David Vaillancourt, Angelos Barmpoutis, Samuel Wu, Jesse Desimone, Marissa Schauder, Robin Chen, Todd Parrish, Wei-en Wang, Eric Molho, John Morgan, David Simon, Burton Scott, Liana Rosenthal, Stephen Gomperts, Rizwan Akhtar, David Grimes, Sol De Jesus, Natividad Stover, Ece Bayram, Adolfo Ramirez Zamora, Stefan Prokop, Ruogu Fang, John Slevin, Prabesh Kanel, Nicolaas Bohnen, Paul Tuite, Stephen Aradi, Antonio Strafella, Mustafa Siddiqui, Albert Davis, Xuemei Huang, Jill Ostrem, Hubert Fernandez, Irene Litvan, Robert Hauser, Alexander Pantelyat, Nikolaus Mcfarland, Tao Xie, Michael Okun, Áine Russell, Hannah Babcock, Karen White Tong, Jun Hua, Anna Goodheart, Erin Peterec, Cynthia Poon, Max Galarce, Tanya Thompson, Autumn Collier, Candace Cromer, Natt Putra, Reilly Costello, Eda Yilmaz, Crystal Mercado, Tomas Mercado, Amanda Fessenden, Renee Wagner, C Spears, Jacqueline Caswell, Marina Bryants, Kristyn Kuzianik, Youshra Ahmed, Nathaniel Bendahan, Joy Njoku, Amy Stiebel, Hengameh Zahed, Sarah Wang, Phuong Hoang, Joseph Seemiller, Guangwei Du