Limb preferences in non-human vertebrates: A new decade.

Over a decade ago, we demonstrated that population-level asymmetries in limb preferences are not uniquely human but occur in various species of non-human animals (Ströckens, F., Güntürkün, O., & Ocklenburg, S. (2013). Limb preferences in non-human vertebrates. Laterality, 18(5), 536-575). While back then, vertebrate limb preference data were too scarce to reconstruct the evolutionary basis of human handedness or apply phylogenetic comparative methods, many voids were filled in the meantime. It is therefore high time to update the last analysis on limb preferences in all non-extinct vertebrate orders in the present article. We show that the robustness of empirical evidence for limb preference in non-human vertebrates increased in the last decade due to (1) more studies, (2) larger sample sizes, and (3) an increased number of meta-analyses integrating findings from various species (e.g., cats, dogs, rats, mice). Similar to the previous publication, we used cladographic comparisons to systematically assess limb preferences in non-extinct vertebrate orders. The identified studies analyzed 172 different species. Overall, 39.53% of species showed evidence for population-level asymmetries, 32.56% showed individual-level asymmetries, and 27.91% showed no asymmetry. These findings not only further support the notion that asymmetries are a widespread feature of vertebrate motor organization, but they also identify crucial gaps that should be filled by future investigations.