Paraprosthetic regurgitation in aortic prostheses: determination of the hemodynamic significance by pulsed Doppler examination of the subclavian artery flow.

Paraprosthetic leaks in aortic prostheses may cause significant aortic regurgitation. Color flow Doppler echocardiography is the method of choice for detecting paraprosthetic leaks, but quantitation of regurgitation is limited by this method. This study investigated the value of pulsed Doppler of the left subclavian artery flow for assessing the hemodynamic significance of paraprosthetic regurgitation in aortic prostheses in 32 patients with, and in 77 control subjects without paraprosthetic leaks. Paraprosthetic leaks were either detected by transthoracic or transesophageal color flow echocardiography. The hemodynamic significance of paraprosthetic regurgitation was determined by means of a dichotomous angiographic classification - significant versus insignificant regurgitation. Pulsed Doppler was performed to measure the maximal diastolic and systolic velocities, and diastolic and systolic velocity-time-integrals (VTI) and their ratios in the subclavian artery flow. The accuracy of these parameters for differentiating significant versus insignificant regurgitation was assessed. Angiography revealed 13 significant and 19 insignificant forms of aortic regurgitation. In all patients, examination of the subclavian artery was feasible by pulsed Doppler. The highest correlation between Doppler derived parameters and regurgitation was calculated for the ratios of diastolic and systolic VTI (r = 0.84), diastolic VTI (r = 0.82) and ratio of diastolic and systolic velocities (r = 0.80). An increase of the ratio of diastolic and systolic VTI (> 45%) and ratio of diastolic to systolic velocity (> 0.4), and increased diastolic VTI (> 60 cm) in the subclavian artery velocity profile identified significant paraprosthetic regurgitation with a sensitivity of 94%, 75% and 87%, and specificity of 87%, 80% and 87%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)