Comparison of standard coronary artery bypass grafting and minimary invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Early and mid-term result.

Objective: We studied indications and problems involved in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB).

Methods: We compared patients profiles, graft patency, stenosis severity, morbidity, mortality, long-term survival and freedom from cardiac accidents in 174 patients undergoing elective standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 128 undergoing between January 1996 and March 1999.

Results: No statistically difference was seen in gender, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, cerebrovascular accident, multi-vessel disease ratios, or left main trunk stenosis between 2 groups. Internal thoracic artery graft patency was 97% (114/118) and the rate of anastomotic stenosis (> 50%) was 9% (10/118) compared to 96% (213/221) in the MIDCAB group. The 3-year survival rate was 91% in the MIDCAB group and 92% in the CABG group and freedom from cardiac accidents, most involving pericutaneus transluminal coronary angioplasty retreatment, was 66% in the MIDCAB group and 88% in the CABG group.

Conclusions: Although patency and stenosis incidence did not differ between 2 groups, freedom from cardiac accidents was lower in the MIDCAB group.