Evaluation of newly developed ELISA using "MESACUP-2 test mitochondrial M2" kit for the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis.
Objective: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using MESACUP-2 Test Mitochondria M2 kit (new-M2 ELISA) has recently become commercially available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of this newly developed ELISA for the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC).
Methods: We tested the immunoreactivity of sera from 82 Japanese PBC patients to the 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex (2-OADC) enzymes by indirect immunofluorescence, enzyme inhibition assay using commercially available TRACE Enzymatic Mitochondrial Antibody (M2) Assay (EMA) kit, commercial ELISAs using MESACUP Mitochondria M2 kit (old-M2 ELISA) and new-M2 ELISA, and immunoblotting on bovine heart mitochondria.
Results: Each test gave the following positive results; antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) by immunofluorescence in 71 (87%) out of the 82 sera, enzymatic inhibitory antibody to pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) by EMA in 61 (74%), immunoglobulin (Ig) G class anti-PDC antibody by old-M2 ELISA in 55 (67%), IgG/M/A class anti-E2 subunit of PDC (PDC-E2)/anti-E2 subunit of branched chain oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex (BCOADC-E2)/anti-E2 subunit of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (OGDC-E2) antibodies by new-M2 ELISA in 73 (89%), and IgG, IgM, or IgA class antibodies against at least one of the 2-OADC enzymes by immunoblotting in 82 (100%). Fifty-three of the 82 sera (65%) were all positive by these five assays. Of the 18 sera that were positive by new-M2 ELISA but negative by old-M2 ELISA, 12 were theoretically interpretable. Of the 11 sera that were negative for AMA by immunofluorescence but positive for at least one of anti-2-OADC enzymes by immunoblotting, four (36%) were positive by new-M2 ELISA, whereas only two and one sera were positive by EMA and old-M2 ELISA, respectively.
Conclusions: Our results indicated that the sensitivity of the newly developed new-M2 ELISA was higher than that of EMA and old-M2 ELISA, and comparable with that of immunofluorescence. However, it is still unclear whether the new-M2 ELISA could replace the conventional immunofluorescence testing for routine assay requests because six (7%) sera showed discrepant results between these two assays.