Chest radiographs of limited utility in the diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration.

Background: The radiographic diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration (BTAL) remains problematic. We reviewed our experience with chest radiographic signs of BTAL at a single trauma center.

Methods: The chest radiographs of 188 consecutive blunt trauma patients with suspected BTAL who underwent portable chest radiography and aortography were retrospectively reviewed by a thoracic radiologist. The presence or absence of 15 radiographic findings were recorded, and the sensitivity and specificity of individual radiographic signs and combinations of signs were determined.

Results: There were 10 patients with BTAL. Although three signs showed greater than 90% sensitivity for BTAL, these signs showed low specificity, and no significant improvement in overall accuracy was achieved by combining radiographic findings.

Conclusions: The experience at our institution suggests that chest radiographs have limited utility in the accurate diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration. Cross-sectional imaging techniques will likely become the preferred imaging procedures for evaluating patients with suspected BTAL.