Techniques and Preferences for Nonvalved Aqueous Shunts: A Survey of American Glaucoma Society Members.

Journal: Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Published:
Abstract

Objective: To assess practice patterns and opinions of glaucoma specialists regarding indications, surgical technique, and postoperative management for nonvalved aqueous shunts. Methods: Anonymous online survey study. Methods: American Glaucoma Society (AGS) members. Methods: An anonymous online survey was distributed to glaucoma specialists via the AGS forum from June to August 2022. Methods: Survey questions and responses were assessed in 4 sections: (1) general demographics and practice patterns; (2) nonvalved tubes vs. trabeculectomy; (3) nonvalved tubes vs. valved tubes; and (4) nonvalved tube techniques. Results: There were 132 respondents; nonvalved tubes were reported to be performed more often than trabeculectomy by 61% of respondents within 5 years of completing training and 23% of respondents with more than 15 years since completing training. The most frequently preferred types of nonvalved tubes were Baerveldt-350 (41%), Baerveldt-250 (27%), and ClearPath-250 (18%). In patients with lower target intraocular pressure (IOP), 92% of respondents preferred trabeculectomy over nonvalved tube; 33% cited a cutoff of < 12 mmHg, and 31% cited a cutoff of < 15 mmHg. In patients with higher preoperative IOP, 50% of respondents preferred valved over nonvalved tubes; 29% cited a cutoff of > 40 mmHg, and 38% cited a cutoff of > 30 mmHg. The most frequently used ligature was 7-0 Vicryl (69%). The most frequently used strategies for early IOP lowering were fenestrations without wicks (70%) and with wicks (22%), with one 10-0 Nylon being the most used wick technique (22%). Overall, 37% of respondents use a ripcord; among ripcord users, 55% use it for hypotony prevention (3-0 Prolene most common for this purpose at 35%), and 40% use it for optional early IOP lowering (4-0 Nylon most common for this purpose at 21%). If IOP is too high at postoperative week 4, 38% of respondents do not open the tube early. Conclusions: We demonstrate significant heterogeneity regarding specific indications, surgical technique, and postoperative management for nonvalved tubes. Future work is needed to identify and develop standardized guidelines alongside best practices.

Background: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Authors
Jason Zhang, Mary Qiu