Background: Limited access to multiple sclerosis (MS)-focused care in rural areas can decrease the quality of life in individuals living with MS while influencing both physical and mental health.

Methods: The objectives of this research were to compare demographic and clinical outcomes in participants with MS who reside within urban, semi-urban and rural settings within Newfoundland and Labrador. All participants were assessed by an MS neurologist, and data collection included participants' clinical history, date of diagnosis, disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use, measures of disability, fatigue, pain, heat sensitivity, depression, anxiety and disease activity.

Results: Overall, no demographic differences were observed between rural and urban areas. Furthermore, the categorization of primary residence did not demonstrate any differences in physical disability or indicators of disease activity. A significantly higher percentage of participants were prescribed platform or high-efficacy DMTs in semi-urban areas; a higher percentage of participants in urban and rural areas were prescribed moderate-efficacy DMTs. Compared to depression, anxiety was more prevalent within the entire cohort. Comparable levels of anxiety were measured across all areas, yet individuals in rural settings experienced greater levels of depression. Individuals living with MS in either an urban or rural setting demonstrated clinical similarities, which were relatively equally managed by DMTs.

Conclusions: Despite greater levels of depression in rural areas, the results of this study highlight that an overall comparable level and continuity of care is provided to individuals living with MS within rural and urban Newfoundland and Labrador.