Device-specific outcomes following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
Objective: To compare aneurysm morphology, initial outcomes and mid-term results in patients receiving Talent or Zenith grafts for elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR).
Methods: Over a 6-year time period ending in 2007, 286 patients underwent elective EVR of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms using Talent or Zenith devices. Patient demographics, aneurysm morphology and initial outcomes (primary-assisted technical success rates, 30-day limb occlusion, re-intervention and mortality) were compared using chi-squared tests or Student's t-tests. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated to compare cumulative rates of freedom from type I or III endoleak, re-intervention, endograft patency and overall survival over mid-term follow-up.
Results: Adverse aneurysm morphology was more common in patients receiving Zenith stent grafts, with a greater proportion of shorter neck lengths (<10mm, 12.9% vs 0%; p
Conclusions: Equivalent primary-assisted technical success rates can be achieved using either Talent or Zenith endografts for endovascular aneurysm repair, but operating teams should be prepared to perform additional adjunctive procedures to obtain a primary proximal seal with either stent. The Zenith endograft performed well in the context of less favourable pre-operative aneurysm morphology. Both Talent and Zenith endografts appeared equally durable in the medium term.