Diagnostic performance of noninvasive tests for identifying advanced fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease with mixed etiologies.

Journal: Endocrine Practice : Official Journal Of The American College Of Endocrinology And The American Association Of Clinical Endocrinologists
Published:
Abstract

Objective: To assess the performance of fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS) and aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) for advanced fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) subgroups categorized by concomitant liver conditions.

Methods: We conducted a multicentered study comprising inpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and MAFLD. Participants were categorized into two groups: MAFLD with pure metabolic etiologies (MAFLD-P) and MAFLD with mixed etiologies (MAFLD-M). Diagnostic performance of FIB-4, NFS and APRI was assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.

Results: This study comprised a total of 1475 participants, with a mean (SD) age of 58.4 (13) years and 835 (56.6%) males. FIB-4 and APRI had higher AUCs for advanced fibrosis in the MAFLD-M group than in the MAFLD-P group (MAFLD-M vs MAFLD-P: FIB-4 0.680 vs 0.591, p = 0.0442; APRI 0.723 vs 0.631, p = 0.0363). No significant difference was observed in the AUC of NFS between the two subgroups (MAFLD-M 0.572 vs MAFLD-P 0.617; p = 0.3237). Besides, the sensitivity of FIB-4 (69.6% vs 54.0%; p = 0.019) and APRI (43.5% vs 26.1%; p = 0.005) was higher in the MAFLD-M group. However, no significant difference in sensitivity of NFS and specificity of FIB-4, NFS and APRI was observed between subgroups.

Conclusions: In this diagnostic study of the T2DM population, FIB-4 and APRI showed better performance for identifying advanced fibrosis in MAFLD with mixed etiologies.

Authors
He Yi, Yan Zhang, Ziwei Zhou, Weixia Sun, Yifan Wang, Wenxuan Tao, Hekai Yu, Liqin Yao, Jia Li, Ling Li